Cases 71 - 80 of 290
Anderson et al v. SNYDER et al
as 5:2020cv10171
Plaintiff:
Verlesa Berry, Keyanna Tims, J. B. and others
Defendant:
Bradley Wurfel, Michael Glasgow, Michael Prysby and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Rochester v. Lee et al
as 6:2020cv00245
Defendant:
A R Lee, P B Wickensimer, R L Blume and others
Plaintiff:
Julian E Rochester
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SURMAN et al v. PAYNE
as 3:2019cv00216
Plaintiff:
NICHOLINA SURMAN and STEPHEN SURMAN, H/W
Defendant:
ROBERT PAYNE and DOT TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Pure & Simple Concepts, Inc. v. I H W Management Limited
as 20-1211
Appellant:
PURE & SIMPLE CONCEPTS, INC.
Appellee:
I H W MANAGEMENT LIMITED, dba Finchley Group
William Donges, et al v. USAA Federal Savings Bank
as 19-17425
Plaintiff / Appellee:
CAROLYN DONGES, named as H/W and WILLIAM R. DONGES, named as H/W
Defendant / Appellant:
USAA FEDERAL SAVINGS BANK
W v. School District of Newberry County
as 8:2019cv03332
Defendant:
School District of Newberry County
Plaintiff:
H W
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Grandinetti v. Hawaii Paroling Authority (HPA) et al
as 1:2019cv00559
Plaintiff:
Francis Grandinetti and Francis Anthony Grandinetti
Defendant:
Jesse Macadamia, Annelle C. Amaral, Governor and others
Interested Party:
Laurie Nadamoto and Shelley Harrington
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
SURMAN et al v. PAYNE
as 2:2019cv04695
Plaintiff:
NICHOLINA SURMAN and STEPHEN SURMAN, H/W
Defendant:
ROBERT PAYNE and DOT TRANSPORTATION, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Kochanek v. United Financial Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv05388
Plaintiff:
Marianne Kochanek
Defendant:
Michael A. Bars, Robert A. Stewart, Jr., Michael F. Crowley and others
O'Connor v. United Financial Bancorp, Inc. et al
as 1:2019cv08532
Defendant:
Raymond H. Lefurge, Jr., Michael A. Bars, Robert A. Stewart, Jr. and others
Plaintiff:
Francis O'Connor
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
