Cases 71 - 78 of 78
Duncan v. Semcrude, L.P.
as 7:2008cv00027
Plaintiff:
James . Duncan and James . Duncan
Defendant:
Semcrude, L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Petition for Removal-Breach of Contract
Duncan v. Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
as 3:2007cv00514
Plaintiff:
James Duncan
Defendant:
Nationwide Mutual Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA vs Greenlea
as 1:2007cv00219
Defendant:
James Duncan Greenlea
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7402 IRS: Petition to Enforce IRS Summons
Duncan et al v. Dana Corporation Pension Plan
as 4:2007cv00058
Plaintiff:
James Duncan, James Duncan, James Duncan and others
Defendant:
Dana Corporation Pension Plan
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
AARON et al v. ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC. et al
as 2:2007cv63025
Plaintiff:
OSCAR AARON, LOWELL ABBOTT, BILLY ADAMS and others
Defendant:
ARMSTRONG WORLD INDUSTRIES, INC., UNITED STATES GYPSUM, ASBESTOS CLAIMS MANAGEMENT CORPORATION and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Duncan et al v. Mayflower Transit LLC
as 3:2007cv00616
Plaintiff:
James Duncan and Estelle Duncan
Defendant:
Mayflower Transit LLC and Mayflower Transit LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal-Breach of Contract
Uchtman v. First Homes Savings Bank et al
as 6:2007cv03047
Plaintiff:
Susan J. Uchtman and Susan J. Uchtman
Defendant:
First Bancshares, Inc., First Bancshares, Inc., First Bancshares, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal
Andrews, et al v. Clark Sand & Co., et al
as 2:2003cv00293
Plaintiff:
Mervin Andrews, Jr., Charles Fortenberry, Larry Sparkman and others
Defendant:
Clark Sand & Co., Sherwin-Williams Company, Vulcan Materials Company and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
