Cases
Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Tyson v. Miller et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2011cv00660
Plaintiff: Laramie Tyson
Defendant: Jack Miller and George Oglesby
Cross_defendant: Crounse Corporation and M/V Ginger Moller
Cross_claimant: Jack Miller and George Oglesby
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333
MIRZA et al v. MILLER et al
as 3:2011cv02192
Plaintiff: SAYEED MIRZA and NASIM MIRZA
Defendant: JACK MILLER , GREGORY MARSH, FAIRGATE PROPERTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
MIRZA et al v. MILLER et al
as 2:2011cv02192
Plaintiff: SAYEED MIRZA and NASIM MIRZA
Defendant: JACK MILLER , GREGORY MARSH, FAIRGATE PROPERTIES and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Plaintiff v. Defendant We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 3:2009cv01550
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jack Miller v. Guaranteed Rate Inc et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 5:2009cv00154
Defendant: Aurora Loan Services, Cal-Western Reconveyance Corporation, Does and others
Plaintiff: Jack Miller
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1444 Notice of Removal - Foreclosure
Merchant v. Norman et al
as 1:2008cv02051
Plaintiff: Derek Merchant
Defendant: Eric Jeffery Norman, Jack Miller and Stephen Snook
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Miller v. Quarterman
as 08-40550
Petitioner - Appellant: MICHAEL JACK MILLER
Respondent - Appellee: NATHANIEL QUARTERMAN, DIRECTOR, TEXAS DEPARTMENT OF CRIMINAL JUSTICE, CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTIONS DIVISION
Miller v. Quarterman
as 3:2008cv00072
Petitioner: Michael Jack Miller
Respondent: Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Miller v. Battle
as 2:2008cv00010
Petitioner: William Jack Miller
Respondent: Ralph Battle
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?