Cases 71 - 80 of 854
CARROLL v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv01082
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD CARROLL
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Hall v. Lumpkin
as 23-10037
Petitioner / Appellant:
John Edward Hall
Respondent / Appellee:
Bobby Lumpkin, Director, Texas Department of Criminal Justice, Correctional Institutions Division
Kumpf v. 3M COMPANY
as 3:2023cv00539
Plaintiff:
John Edward Kumpf
Defendant:
3M COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
(PC) Mitchell v. Gonzales et al
as 2:2023cv00029
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
C. Gonzales and A. Levya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Mitchell v. Gonzales et al
as 1:2023cv00062
Plaintiff:
John Edward Mitchell
Defendant:
C. Gonzales and A. Levya
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Eastern Atlantic Insurance Company v. L&A Trucking of Brunswick, LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00142
Plaintiff:
Eastern Atlantic Insurance Company
Defendant:
L&A Trucking of Brunswick, LLC, Corey Stephen Burnett and John Edward Murdock
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Declaratory Judgment
Foland v. State of New York et al
as 1:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
John Edward Foland
Defendant:
State of New York, Commonwealth of Pennsylvania and State of Ohio
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
LAMOND II v. BERNSTEIN
as 4:2022cv00143
Plaintiff:
JOHN EDWARD LAMOND II
Defendant:
HOWARD N BERNSTEIN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01158
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Neill v. Syngenta AG et al
as 3:2022pq02562
Special Master:
Randi Ellis
Plaintiff:
John Edward Neill
Defendant:
Syngenta AG, Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC and Chevron USA, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
