Cases 71 - 80 of 719
Johnson v. Sequatchie County Government
as 3:2022cv00331
Plaintiff:
Alvin Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Sequatchie County Government and Van Buren County Government
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2022cv03170
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
JOHNSON v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 2:2022cv01320
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 5:2022cv03121
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Warden
as 5:2022cv03058
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Warden
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Unnamed Respondent
as 3:2022cv01192
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Warden and Unnamed Respondent
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Johnson v. Marlboro County
as 5:2022cv03064
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
Marlboro County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
Johnson v. Navarro et al
as 2:2022cv01267
Plaintiff:
Travon Deautry Lee Johnson
Defendant:
Jacob Navarro, Christopher Leyda, Terrence R Carlstrom and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Johnson v. State of South Carolina
as 5:2022cv03018
Petitioner:
Jarrel Lee Johnson
Respondent:
State of South Carolina
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (County)
JOHNSON v. UNNAMED RESPONDENT
as 4:2022cv00133
Petitioner:
JARREL LEE JOHNSON
Respondent:
UNNAMED RESPONDENT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
