Cases 71 - 80 of 572
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv03216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Jimmy FanFan v. M.C.C.
as 22-2046
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Jimmy S. FanFan
Defendant / Appellee:
M.C.C., F.B.O.P., MD. Robert Beaudouin and others
US v. Vavic
as 22-1787
Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellee:
JOVAN VAVIC
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA, LOS ANGELES, REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA and others
Lubrano et al v. Morgenstern et al
as 1:2022cv04987
Plaintiff:
Giuseppe Lubrano
Defendant:
Esther Mickey Morgenstern, Eric Gonzales, NYC Mayor Eric Adams and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Lopes v. Rockwood
as 7:2022cv07887
Petitioner:
Christopher Lopes
Respondent:
M. Rockwood
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv08270
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Alternative Dispute Resolution (Adr) Provider:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2022cv00021
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Blanca Mendoza et al v. County of Kings, et al
as 1:2021cv00721
Defendant:
Tim Steadman, County of Kings, A. Rivera and others
Plaintiff:
B.M., Blanca Mendoza and B. M.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
US v. Colburn
as 22-1304
Appellee:
UNITED STATES
Defendant / Appellant:
AMY COLBURN
Interested Party:
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA, WILLIAM RICK SINGER, WILLIAMS & OLDS, CPAS and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
