Cases 71 - 80 of 103
Michael Hughes v. William Knipp
as 12-72151
Petitioner:
MICHAEL L. HUGHES
Respondent:
WILLIAM KNIPP, Warden
Michael Hughes v. Nevada Department of Correctio, et al
as 12-16454
Petitioner - Appellant:
MICHAEL RAY HUGHES
Respondent - Appellee:
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, WARDEN MCDANIELS and NEVADA ATTORNEY GENERAL
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc. v. Hughes II et al
as 2:2012cv00449
Plaintiff:
Joe Hand Promotions, Inc.
Defendant:
Michael W. Hughes II and Hughes Management, LLC
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553
Hughes v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
as 2:2012cv00660
Defendant:
Isidro Baca, Renee Baker, Mrs. Barrett and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Ray Hughes
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hughes v. Knipp
as 3:2012cv01276
Petitioner:
Michael Lynn Hughes
Respondent:
William Knipp
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv00062
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Hughes v. Nevada Department Of Corrections et al
as 3:2011cv00355
Petitioner:
Michael Ray Hughes
Respondent:
Warden McDaniels, Nevada Attorney General and Nevada Department Of Corrections
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Smith et al v. Davidson et al
as 3:2011cv00189
Plaintiff:
James R. Smith , Roosevelt Via , James A. Wright and others
Defendant:
W. Robert Davidson , William A. Nations , William Strickland and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132
Hughes v. CSX Transportation, Inc.
as 2:2011cv00054
Plaintiff:
Michael S Hughes
Defendant:
CSX Transportation, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Kenneth G. Keel v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2008cv07591
Petitioner:
Terry Philpott, Danny Bell, George Lincoln Coats and others
Defendant:
Justice For Homicde Victims, Inc., Pete Wilson, Arnold Schwarzenegger and others
Plaintiff:
Kenneth G. Keel
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
