Cases 71 - 80 of 609
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01461
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
McAfee v. United States of America et al
as 3:2022cv00342
Plaintiff:
Thomas McAfee
Defendant:
United States of America and United States Postal Service
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2671 Federal Tort Claims Act
Andres et al v. Ford Motor Company
as 1:2022cv00775
Plaintiff:
January Andres, Simao Anton, Steven Brittain and others
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Invincible IP LLC v. McAfee, LLC
as 4:2022cv00458
Plaintiff:
Invincible IP LLC
Defendant:
McAfee, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
McAfee v. Southeastern Grocers et al
as 9:2022cv01711
Plaintiff:
Helen McAfee
Defendant:
Southeastern Grocers d/b/a BI-LO, Winn Dixie Stores, Inc., BI-LO, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
USA v. McAfee
as 22-60284
Plaintiff / Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Frank McAfee
Waples v. May et al
as 1:2022cv00616
Plaintiff:
Javaughn D. Waples
Defendant:
John May, Sherri McAfee-Garner and Centurion
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
McAfee v. Equifax, Inc.
as 1:2022cv00216
Plaintiff:
Branden McAfee
Defendant:
Equifax, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00261
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Sotelo v. More Flavors, Incorporated
as 1:2022cv01661
Plaintiff:
Maria Manuel Sotelo
Defendant:
More Flavors, Incorporated dba Taurus Flavors, Marian McAfee and More Flavors, Incorporated doing business as Taurus Flavors
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
