Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 6,586
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00390
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
US v. Belhassan
as 24-1208
Defendant / Appellee: UNITED STATES
Defendant: MEHDI BELHASSAN
Interested Party: GUIOMAR ALVAREZ, DONNIE AMADO, MATHIEU AMAR and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01200
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
Nguyen v. Ho
as 1:2024cv10588
Plaintiff: Kim Nguyen
Defendant: Anthony Ho
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01027
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2024cv00499
Plaintiff: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101 Americans With Disabilities Act
In re Naturalization Ceremony 03/13/24
as 5:2024mc80052
Not Yet Classified: Naturalization Ceremony, Refal Hussein Ali Al Mhaoush, Damon Jay Civin and others
Minnis v. O' Malley
as 5:2024cv00013
Plaintiff: Ngan Kim Nguyen Minnis
Defendant: Martin O' Malley
Interested Party: Social Security Administration and United States Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Georgia
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Secy HUD v. Dangtran
as 24-60098
Petitioner: Secretary of United States Department of Housing and Urban Development
Respondent: Quang Dangtran, Ha Nguyen and HQD Enterprise, L.L.C.
Nguyen et al v. Scottsdale Insurance Company
as 2:2024cv00188
Plaintiff: Nhan Hien Nguyen and Thanh Van Thi Nguyen
Defendant: Scottsdale Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Type: Contract Insurance

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?