Cases 71 - 80 of 113
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2015cv04002
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2015cv00011
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2003
Robbie Evans, et al v. Professional Transportation
as 14-6132
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBBIE PICKETT EVANS and GEORGE R. BOOTH
Defendant - Appellee:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC.
ASBRIDGE JR et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC et al
as 3:2014cv00129
Plaintiff:
THOMAS ASBRIDGE JR, DONNA BAILEY, ROBERT BLACKSON and others
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION INC and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2014cv01739
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
BLAIR v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00055
Plaintiff:
DENESSA V. BLAIR
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 704 Labor Litigation
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2014cv00986
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Garecht v. Professional Transportation, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00378
Plaintiff:
John Garecht
Defendant:
Professional Transportation, Inc. and Ronald D Romain
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Berns et al v. Union Pacific Railroad Company
as 2:2014cv00328
Plaintiff:
Susanne Berns
Involuntary_plaintiff:
Professional Transportation Inc
Defendant:
Union Pacific Railroad Company
Cause Of Action: 45 U.S.C. § 51
BLAIR et al v. PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. et al
as 3:2014cv00018
Plaintiff:
DENESSA V. BLAIR
Defendant:
PROFESSIONAL TRANSPORTATION, INC. and RONALD D. ROMAIN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Fair Labor Standards
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
