Cases 71 - 80 of 231
KOLLOCK v. BEEMER et al
as 3:2018cv00208
Respondent:
JOHN E. TUTTLE, ALAN ROBINSON, JOHN E. WETZEL and others
Petitioner:
JASON P. KOLLOCK
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) Daniels v. Johnson et al
as 1:2018cv01160
Defendant:
J. Harry, A. Della Porta, K. Lewis and others
Plaintiff:
Sonya Marie Daniels
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Mony Life Insurance Company
as 8:2018cv02123
Defendant:
Mony Life Insurance Company
Plaintiff:
Bernard R. Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Caplan v. AUTOTECH ALARM PEOPLE CORP. et al
as 1:2018cv23285
Plaintiff:
Howard Michael Caplan
Defendant:
HECTOR R. PEREZ, DAISY G. PEREZ and AUTOTECH ALARM PEOPLE CORP.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12182
Perez v. Binkele et al
as 5:2018cv04856
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Perez
Defendant:
R. Binkele, E. Moore, R. Salgado and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. Binkele et al
as 3:2018cv04856
Defendant:
Jeffrey H. Bass, A. Franco, J. Peffley and others
Plaintiff:
Matthew R. Perez
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Perez v. United States of America
as 4:2018cv00652
Defendant:
United States of America
Plaintiff:
Jaime R Perez
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1346
Gregory Bontemps v. R. Perez, et al
as 18-16023
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY C. BONTEMPS
Defendant - Appellee:
R. PEREZ, Correctional Officer and W. SILLAS, Correctional Officer
Vintage Assets, Incorporated, et al v. Tennessee Gas Pipeline Company, et al
as 18-30688
Plaintiff - Appellee:
VINTAGE ASSETS, INCORPORATED, MERCEDES PEREZ MACK EXEMPT TRUST, Whitney Bank Successor Trustee, ANNE PEREZ INABNETT and others
Defendant - Appellant:
TENNESSEE GAS PIPELINE COMPANY, L.L.C., SOUTHERN NATURAL GAS COMPANY, L.L.C., HIGH POINT GAS TRANSMISSION, L.L.C. and others
Gregory Smith v. R. Cobb, et al
as 18-55545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
GREGORY SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
R. COBB, CCI SHARPE, J. CAREY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
