Cases 71 - 80 of 153
Smith v. Colvin
as 1:2016cv00953
Plaintiff:
Jack Raymond Smith
Defendant:
Carolyn W. Colvin
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Valle et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as MOE/4:16-cv-01706
Plaintiff:
Deanna Valle , Roberta Adams , April Avent and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Valle et al v. Johnson & Johnson et al
as 4:2016cv01706
Plaintiff:
Deanna Valle , Roberta Adams , April Avent and others
Defendant:
Johnson & Johnson, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson Consumer Inc. and Imerys Talc America, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
US v. Leslie Okyere
as 16-4375
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
LESLIE OKYERE, a/k/a Raymond Smith
SMITH v. USA
as 1:2016cv01573
Petitioner:
JOHN RAYMOND SMITH
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Holt, et al vs. XTO Energy, Inc.
as 7:2016cv00162
Plaintiff:
Wesley Holt and Raymond Smith
Defendant:
XTO Energy, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
In re: Raymond Smith
as 16-13250
Petitioner:
In re: RAYMOND SMITH
Successive Habeas Respondent:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Smith et al v. Accredited Home Lenders, Inc. et al
as 2:2016cv00869
Defendant:
Accredited Home Lenders, Inc., HSBC Finance Corporation, HSBC Home Equity Corporation I and others
Plaintiff:
Lessie Riggs-Smith and Raymond Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition to Quiet Title
Ortiz v. State of Hawaii
as 1:2016cv00126
Petitioner:
Anibal Ortiz
Respondent:
State of Hawaii and Raymond Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
UPP v. PENTZ et al
as 1:2015cv02085
Defendant:
SCHWAN APPELGETT, CO-CONSPIRATORS RECEIVING FEDERAL MONEY, FRAUD GENERATED ACTIONS and others
Plaintiff:
MARTIN UPP
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
