Cases 71 - 80 of 118
Resper v. Webb et al
as 8:2015cv01253
Defendant:
Wayne Webb, Richard Graham, Jr., Officer Robey and others
Plaintiff:
Wayne Resper
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Marks v. Graham
as 1:2015cv00840
Plaintiff:
Russell Marks
Defendant:
Richard Graham, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Charles Canter, III v. Richard Graham, Jr.
as 15-6116
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CHARLES R. CANTER, III
Defendant - Appellee:
RICHARD GRAHAM, JR., Warden, JAMES TITCHNELL, Case Manager Manager, T. HUMBERTSON, Case Manager Specialist and others
Eatman School Alumni Association et al v. Winn et al
as 7:2015cv00078
Plaintiff:
Eatman School Alumni Association , Virginia Holley , Richard Graham and others
Defendant:
Luther "Nat" Winn, Greentrack Inc and Daniel Thompson
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1962
Canter v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv03995
Plaintiff:
Charles R. Canter , III
Defendant:
Richard Graham, Jr., James Titchnell, T. Humbertson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Wilkerson v. Graham et al
as 8:2014cv03095
Petitioner:
Reginald Wilkerson
Respondent:
Richard Graham and Douglas F. Gansler
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Kahale (Reisman)
as 14-3377
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Harry K. Kahale, Harold Richard Graham and Gregory C. Scarlato
Defendant - Appellant:
Mitchell Reisman
Carter-El v. Oakley et al
as 1:2014cv02545
Plaintiff:
Dontay Carter-El
Defendant:
Scott S. Oakley, Robin Woolford, Lenora Adegbesan and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Spakes et al v. G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
as 3:2014cv00349
Plaintiff:
Tommy Spakes , Alvin Arnwine , Daniel Barnes and others
Defendant:
G4S Government Solutions, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Webecke v. Salt Lake City et al
as 2:2013cv01132
Plaintiff:
Richard Graham Webecke
Defendant:
Salt Lake City, Chris Burbank, Salt Lake City Police Department and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
