Cases 71 - 79 of 79
Hicks v. C.R. Bard, Inc. et al
as 1:2008cv02146
Plaintiff:
Robert D. Hicks
Defendant:
C.R. Bard, Inc. and Davol, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Diversity
HICKS v. ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
as 2:2008cv64478
Plaintiff:
ROBERT L. HICKS and ROBERT L. HICKS
Defendant:
ZURN INDUSTRIES, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Asbestos Litigation
Hicks v. C R Bard, Incorporated et al
as 2:2007cv15310
Plaintiff:
Robert D Hicks
Defendant:
C R Bard, Incorporated and Davol, Incorporated
Cause Of Action: No cause code entered
Thunderhorse, et al v. Owens, et al
as 07-51148
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LEROY ANTHONY BACA, ROBERT ALLEN HICKS, CARL ALBERT MARLEY and others
Defendant - Appellee:
RISSI L OWENS, In her official capacity as member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, JOSE ALISEDA, JR., In his official capacity as member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles, CHARLES AYCOCK, In his official capacity as member of the Texas Board of Pardons and Paroles and others
Bixler et al v. Guidant Corporation et al
as 0:2007cv03299
Plaintiff:
Charles Bixler, Charles Bixler, Brenda Bothwell and others
Defendant:
Guidant Corporation, Guidant Sales Corporation, Cardiac Pacemakers Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 -pip-Diversity-Personal Injury, Product Liability
Hicks v. Bartlett
as 1:2007cv00746
Petitioner:
Robert B, Hicks
Respondent:
James Bartlett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Hicks v. Dormire
as 4:2007cv00027
Petitioner:
Robert A Hicks
Respondent:
Dave Dormire
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
United States of America v. Hicks
as 4:2006mc00257
Petitioner:
United States of America
Respondent:
Robert W. Hicks
Robert S. Hicks v. American Standard, et al.
as VAE/2:04-CV-07795
Plaintiff:
Robert S. Hicks
Defendant:
American Standard
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
