Cases 71 - 80 of 86
Jones v. Crittenden County Public Defender et al
as 3:2011cv00142
Plaintiff:
David Tyron Jones
Defendant:
Crittenden County Public Defender, Thomas Montgomery, Jane Doe and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Avery et al v. Brown et al
as 5:2011cv00174
Plaintiff:
Chadarious Avery and Karen Walls
Defendant:
Earnest E Brown, Jr , Roderick Shelby , Gerald Robinson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Reed et al
as 6:2010cv06086
Plaintiff:
Shelby King
Defendant:
Reed and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
King v. Reed et al
as 4:2010cv01543
Plaintiff:
Shelby King
Defendant:
Reed and Does
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company v. Shelby County Healthcare Corporation
as 3:2010cv00169
Plaintiff:
State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company
Defendant:
Shelby County Healthcare Corporation
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201
Ingram v. Sanders et al
as 6:2010cv06044
Plaintiff:
Shelby Ingram
Defendant:
Larry Sanders and Mel Steed
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Batemon v. Arkansas, State of et al
as 5:2010cv00010
Plaintiff:
Billy Batemon
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of, Tri County Drug Task Force, John Does and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Other Civil Rights
Scales v. Social Security Administration
as 3:2009cv00221
Plaintiff:
Shelby Scales
Defendant:
Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 206 Social Security Benefits
USA v. Arkansas, State of, et al
as 4:1978cv00025
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Arkansas, State of , Douglas W Harp , Lawrence E Gwyn and others
Intervenor:
Wendell Adams , Larry Astin , Ron Ball and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Johnson v. Texarkana Arkansas School District No. 1 et al
as 4:2009cv04012
Plaintiff:
Andrea Johnson
Defendant:
Texarkana Arkansas School District No. 1, Jimmy Hickey, Jr., Anthony Ware and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.