Cases 71 - 80 of 2,723
Johnson v. Chapin, et al
as 24-1010
Plaintiff:
JABARI J. JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAVID CHAPIN, JESSICA AGGSON, FNU STEIN, Lt. and others
Black Polaski et al v. Stein
as 7:2024cv00004
Plaintiff:
Morag Black Polaski, Shawana Almendarez and North Carolina Justice For All Project
Defendant:
Josh Stein
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Dominique Daniels v. Kaiser Foundation Hospitals et al
as 8:2024cv00022
Plaintiff:
Dominique Daniels
Defendant:
Kaiser Foundation Hospitals, Cesar Aguda, Andrea Campbell and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Crenshaw v. Doll et al
as 3:2024cv50012
Plaintiff:
Michael P. Crenshaw
Defendant:
David A. Doll, J. Hanley, Michele Grimaldi-Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hernandez El v. Stein et al
as 5:2023hc02285
Petitioner:
Ra Saadi Lennox Hernandez El and Carlos Hernandez
Respondent:
Joshua H Stein and North Carolina Department of Adult Correction
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Fred Murphy v. Mike Slagle
as 23-7303
Petitioner:
FRED MURPHY
Respondent:
MIKE SLAGLE, Warden and JOSHUA STEIN
Maria Nogara v. Lynn Law Office, PC, et al
as 23-14135
Plaintiff:
MARIA NOGARA
Defendant:
LYNN LAW OFFICE, PC and JOEL K. STEIN
Kumar, et al. v. Koester, et al.
as 23-4363
Plaintiff / Appellant:
SUNIL KUMAR and PRAVEEN SINHA
Defendant / Appellee:
JOLENE KOESTER, in her official capacity as Chancellor of California State University, LARRY ADAMSON, DIANA AGUILAR-CRUZ and others
Stein v. Kohn
as 23-8078
Petitioner / Appellant:
RAPHAEL STEIN, acting on behalf of his minor children J.S.. Z.N.,. A.Z.
Respondent / Appellee:
ADEENA KOHN
Johnson (PS) v. Chapin et al
as 1:2023cv03325
Plaintiff:
Jabari J. Johnson
Defendant:
David Chapin, Jessica Aggson, FNU Stein and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
