Cases 71 - 80 of 107
Rogers v. Astrue
as 1:2012cv02641
Plaintiff:
Quittion T. Rogers and Social Security Regional Administrator - NEF Only
Defendant:
Michael J. Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hicks et al v. Hayward et al
as 2:2012cv13147
Plaintiff:
Kwann Hicks and Mario Lewis
Defendant:
B. Hayward and T. Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
The Bank of New York Mellon v. Rogers et al
as 1:2012cv04393
Plaintiff:
The Bank of New York Mellon
Defendant:
Edna T Rogers and Kelvin Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Rogers v. Denecke
as 5:2012cv00373
Plaintiff:
Demetrius T Rogers
Defendant:
Raymond E Denecke
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crenshaw Subway Coalition v. Federal Transit Administration et al
as 2:2012cv01672
Plaintiff:
Crenshaw Subway Coalition
Defendant:
Federal Transit Administration, Ray Lahood, Leslie T Rogers and others
Rogers et al v. DePuy Inc. et al
as OHN/1:12-dp-20447
Plaintiff:
Dana Ann Rogers and Warren T. Rogers
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Rogers et al v. DePuy Inc. et al
as 1:2012dp20447
Plaintiff:
Dana Ann Rogers and Warren T. Rogers
Defendant:
DePuy Inc. , Depuy Orthopaedics Inc. , DePuy International Limited and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Crime Justice & America Inc et al v. Rogers et al
as 2:2012cv00115
Plaintiff:
Crime Justice & America Inc and Ray Hrdlicka
Defendant:
Frank T Rogers , Noah Stewart and Does 1-20
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crime Justice & America Inc et al v. Rogers et al
as WAE/2:12-cv-00115
Plaintiff:
Crime Justice & America Inc and Ray Hrdlicka
Defendant:
Frank T Rogers , Noah Stewart , Does 1-20 and others
Muhammad v. Davis, et al
as 11-4632
Plaintiff - Appellant:
MARC ANTWAIN X. RIVERS MUHAMMAD, SR.
Defendant - Appellee:
YVETTE DAVIS, LUZERNE COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF PUBLIC WELFARE, LUZERNE COUNTY COURT OF COMMON PLEAS DOMESTIC RELATIONS SECTION and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
