Cases 71 - 80 of 1,703
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2022cv00271
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Best Carpet Values, Inc., et al v. Google LLC
as 22-15899
Plaintiff / Appellee:
BEST CARPET VALUES, INC. and THOMAS D. RUTLEDGE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Defendant / Appellant:
GOOGLE LLC
Mos-Bey v. Shroeder et al
as 5:2022ct03184
Plaintiff:
C. Joseph Mos-Bey and Christopher Mosby
Defendant:
Thomas D. Shroeder, John Brubaker, Joe L. Webster and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2022cv01287
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1361 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
HOWARD v. KENNY et al
as 2:2022cv02099
Plaintiff:
TROY DEWAYNE HOWARD
Defendant:
THOMAS D. KENNY and KENNY, BURNS & MCGILL
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Best Carpet Values, Inc., et al v. Google LLC
as 22-80042
Respondent:
BEST CARPET VALUES, INC. and THOMAS D. RUTLEDGE, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated
Petitioner:
GOOGLE LLC
BAKER v. ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORPORATION et al
as 2:2022cv01629
Plaintiff:
LEWIS D BAKER
Defendant:
ZURN WATER SOLUTIONS CORPORATION, TODD A ADAMS, MARK S BARTLETT and others
Cause Of Action: 12 U.S.C. § 22 Securities Fraud
Renfro v. People Of The State Of KY et al
as 3:2022cv00227
Plaintiff:
Phillip W. Renfro
Defendant:
People Of The State Of KY, Cookie Crews, Todd D. Ferguson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Whitfield v. Zurn Water Solutions Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02307
Plaintiff:
Matthew Whitfield
Defendant:
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation, Todd A. Adams, Mark S. Bartlett and others
Riggs v. Zurn Water Solutions Corporation et al
as 1:2022cv02209
Plaintiff:
Rodney Riggs
Defendant:
Zurn Water Solutions Corporation, Todd A. Adams, Mark S. Bartlett and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
