Cases 71 - 80 of 199
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv07100
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201
Adrain v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al
as 2:2013cv00967
Plaintiff:
John B. Adrain
Defendant:
Amazon.com, Inc. , Best Buy Co., Inc. , GameStop Corp. and others
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
TOYS "R" US, INC. v. COLONY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
as 2:2013cv06759
Plaintiff:
TOYS "R" US, INC.
Defendant:
COLONY NATIONAL INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv04834
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC v. JoJo Designs, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv05818
Plaintiff:
Michael Miller Fabrics, LLC
Defendant:
JoJo Designs, LLC, Smart Deals, Inc, Target Corporation and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101
Choon's Design, LLC v. LaRose Industries, LLC et al
as 2:2013cv13569
Plaintiff:
Choon's Design, LLC
Defendant:
LaRose Industries, LLC and Toys R Us, Inc.
Counter_claimant:
Toys R Us, Inc. and LaRose Industries, LLC
Counter_defendant:
Choon's Design, LLC
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Arunachalam v. Toys "R" Us, Inc.
as 2:2013cv00610
Plaintiff:
Lakshmi Arunachalam
Defendant:
Toys "R" Us, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
Go-Go Babyz Corporation v. Brica Inc. et al
as 1:2013cv01261
Plaintiff:
Go-Go Babyz Corporation
Defendant:
Brica Inc. and Toys R Us Inc.
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271 Patent Infringement
Dimascio v. RAZOR USA, LLC et al
as 1:2013cv11728
Plaintiff:
Brian Dimascio
Defendant:
RAZOR USA, LLC and Toys R Us, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Product Liability
Garr v. Toys "R" US, Inc. et al
as 4:2013cv00597
Plaintiff:
Teresa Garr
Defendant:
Toys "R" US, Inc. and TOYSRUS.com
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
