Cases
Cases 71 - 80 of 312
Mable v. United States District Court of Western Washington et al
as 2:2016cv00697
Plaintiff: Margaret Mable
Defendant: United States District Court of Western Washington and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DENOYER v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION et al
as 1:2016cv00830
Petitioner: DALE ERNEST DENOYER
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION, UNITED STATES ATTORNEY GENERAL, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Eldridge v. Oliver et al We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00690
Petitioner: Clinton T. Eldridge
Respondent: J. Oliver and U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
CHATMON v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
as 2:2016cv01266
Petitioner: CARLTON B. CHATMON
Respondent: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2016cv00492
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALLOY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 3:2016cv00418
Petitioner: GERALD J. MALLOY
Respondent: U.S Department of Justice , Federal Bureau of Prisons , Charles E. Samuels, Jr. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 8:2016cv00686
Petitioner: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent: Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
SWEENEY v. U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case
as 1:2016cv00404
Plaintiff: JOHN SWEENEY
Defendant: U.S. PAROLE COMMISSION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
MALLOY v. U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE et al
as 1:2016cv00287
Petitioner: GERALD J. MALLOY
Respondent: U.S. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE, FEDERAL BUREAU OF PRISONS, CHARLES E. SAMUELS, JR. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Geary v. U.S. Parole Commission
as 1:2016cv10177
Petitioner: David Harold Geary
Respondent: U.S. Parole Commission
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?