Cases 71 - 80 of 265,961
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00357
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Reese v. Goulee et al
as 2:2024cv00688
Plaintiff:
Thomas Reese
Defendant:
Michael D Goulee, Jorge Gomez, Craig Miller and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Williams et al v. HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, a California Corporation,
as 5:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Kellie Williams and Chris Williams
Defendant:
HYUNDAI MOTOR AMERICA, a California Corporation,
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2301 Magnuson-Moss Warranty Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04627
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv04629
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
CRUZ v. DONDON et al
as 4:2024cv00233
Plaintiff:
FRANCISCO RODRIGUEZ CRUZ
Defendant:
DONDON, M WILLIAMS, SHEREA GREEN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06650
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv06649
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Hill v. Rankins et al
as 5:2024cv00564
Petitioner:
Patrick Henry Hill, II
Respondent:
William C Rankins and Attorney General of the State of Oklahoma
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Emerick v. Schmitt et al
as 1:2024cv22139
Plaintiff:
William Gale Emerick
Defendant:
Brian Schmitt, Brett Newman, Unknown ATTORNEY 1 and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
