Cases 71 - 80 of 1,166
Witherspoon v. Wilson
as 1:2022cv00416
Plaintiff:
Giles Witherspoon
Defendant:
Patrick Wilson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WITHERSPOON v. USA
as 1:2022cv00209
Petitioner:
JIMMY JAMES WITHERSPOON
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Witherspoon v. United Nations et al
as 1:2022cv01535
Plaintiff:
Desmond M. Witherspoon
Defendant:
United Nations, Big River Steel, C. Mayo Inc. Custom Metal Fabrication and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 cv Fed. Question: Other Civil Rights
Ferguson et al v. City of New York et al
as 1:2022cv01000
Plaintiff:
Ronisha Ferguson, S.J. and A.J.
Defendant:
THE CITY OF NEW YORK, KerryAnne Graham, Alphy Contreras and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 dp Civil Right Denial of Due Process
WITHERSPOON v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 3:2022cv00359
Plaintiff:
DARRYL WITHERSPOON
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission v. Boveda Asset Management, Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv05321
Plaintiff:
U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission
Defendant:
Boveda Asset Management, Inc. and George Kenneth Witherspoon, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 80 Investment Companies and Advisers
Cloyd v. KBR
as 21-20676
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Kevin Cloyd, Nickalandra Witherspoon and Lucila Andrade
Defendant / Appellee:
KBR, Incorporated and KBR, Inc.
Edward Witherspoon v. Frank Bishop
as 21-7741
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD WITHERSPOON
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Edward Witherspoon v. Frank Bishop
as 21-7740
Petitioner / Appellant:
EDWARD WITHERSPOON
Respondent / Appellee:
FRANK B. BISHOP and MARYLAND ATTORNEY GENERAL
Witherspoon v. Wyandotte County, Kansas et al
as 5:2021cv03286
Plaintiff:
Darshawn Witherspoon
Defendant:
Wyandotte County, Kansas and Wyandotte County Jail
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
