Cases 71 - 80 of 134,063
B.J.P. v. South Carolina Department of Corrections
as 24-6388
Plaintiff:
B.J.P.
Defendant:
SOUTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, (SCDC), By and Through Its Director, Bryan P. Stirling, SCDC DIRECTOR BRYAN P. STIRLING, in his Individual and Official Capacities, SCDC DEP. DIR. DENNIS PATTERSON, in his Individual and Official Capacities and others
Gross v. USA-2255
as 1:2024cv01247
Petitioner:
Donald Gross
Respondent:
USA-2255
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Azar El v. Cabarrus County et al
as 3:2024cv00423
Petitioner:
Rashaud Hussein Azar El doing business as Jerimy Love
Respondent:
Cabarrus County, Cabarrus County Jail, Mike Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
El-Bey v. Logsdon et al
as 1:2024cv01169
Plaintiff:
Bro Stephen Michael El-Bey
Defendant:
William Logsdon, F. Farinloye, NDZE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
US v. Christopher Park
as 24-6387
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
CHRISTOPHER LOUIS PARK
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-6385
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Hernandez v. Rokosky
as 1:2024cv00091
Petitioner:
Marco Hernandez
Respondent:
E. Rokosky
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federal)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv01188
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Brown v. State of Maryland
as 1:2024cv00630
Plaintiff:
Jermall Brown
Defendant:
State of Maryland
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
Castaneda-Benavidez v. Joseph
as 5:2024cv01037
Petitioner:
Cesar Castaneda-Benavidez
Respondent:
Warden Joseph
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (Federal)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
