Cases 81 - 90 of 121
Flores v. USA
as 4:2012cv00075
Petitioner:
Israel R. Flores
Respondent:
USA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
U.S. Bank, National Association v. Flores et al
as 1:2012cv01185
Plaintiff:
U.S. Bank, National Association
Defendant:
Refugio R Flores, Maria R Flores, Asset Acceptance, LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company v. Flores et al
as 1:2011cv08300
Plaintiff:
Deutsche Bank National Trust Company
Defendant:
Bolivar R Flores, Jr, Airko Heating and Cooling and Nicor Gas Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2011cv02173
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
USA v. Martin Rodriguez
as 11-41186
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
MARTIN FLORES RODRIGUEZ, also known as Lopez Barajas, also known as Grabiel R. Flores, also known as Francis Javier, also known as Martin Flores, also known as Mauricio Garcia, also known as Francis Javier Lopezbarajas, also known as Martin Flores-Rodrigu
MCELWAIN v. PARRISH
as 3:2011cv00515
Plaintiff:
WAYNE MCELWAIN
Defendant:
ERIC L PARRISH, R D HOUSTON, P J BROWN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Flores v. McCabe et al
as 6:2011cv02773
Petitioner:
Jose R Flores
Respondent:
Warden McCabe and David L Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
FLORES v. A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
as 2:2011cv51274
Plaintiff:
ROMEO R. FLORES
Defendant:
A-C PRODUCT LIABILITY TRUST
Cause Of Action: 46 U.S.C. § 0688
Kevin Fields v. Derral Adam, et al
as 11-17230
Plaintiff - Appellant:
KEVIN E. FIELDS
Defendant - Appellee:
DERRAL G. ADAM, Warden, R. DAVIS, Associate Warden, MAURICE JUNIOUS, Chief Deputy Warden and others
Flores v. Arpaio
as 2:2011cv01364
Plaintiff:
Jose R Flores
Defendant:
Joseph M Arpaio
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
