Cases 81 - 90 of 365
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00890
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 ra
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2020cv00386
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2020at00636
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Gunther v. AT&T Mobility Services, LLC.
as 5:2020cv03293
Plaintiff:
Mr. Daniel Gunther and Daniel Gunther
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services, LLC.
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2020cv00698
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 ea
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2017cv04827
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621
PALUSH v. AT&T MOBILITY, LLC d/b/a AT&T WIRELESS et al
as 2:2020cv01978
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY, LLC d/b/a AT&T WIRELESS, AT&T MOBILITY SERVICE, LLC d/b/a AT&T WIRELESS, APPLE INC. and others
Lead Plaintiff:
CONNOR PALUSH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1391
Bennett v. AT&T Mobility Services LLC et al
as 4:2020cv00166
Defendant:
AT&T Mobility Services LLC, Peggy L Fletcher, Chad McKinley and others
Plaintiff:
Debra Bennett
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2020cv00606
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Dolores Gaines, et al v. Emmanuel Morales, et al
as 20-55008
Defendant / Appellant:
EMMANUEL MORALES, an Individual
Defendant:
AT&T MOBILITY SERVICES LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company and DOES, 1 through 50 inclusive
Plaintiff:
DOLORES GAINES, an individual, MARIO HALL, Jr., an individual and RYAN BAGSBY, an individual
Plaintiff / Appellee:
KENYATA MARTIN, an individual and BRANISHA NEWBERRY, an individual
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
