Cases 81 - 90 of 112
Mastro v. Electronic Arts, Inc. et al
as 3:2014cv00188
Plaintiff:
Louis Mastro
Defendant:
Electronic Arts, Inc. , Andrew Wilson , Blake Jorgensen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
United States of America v. Knowles (Glivens)
as 13-4858
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Christopher Glivens, AKA Young Gunners
Kelly v. Electronic Arts, Inc. et al
as 3:2013cv05837
Plaintiff:
Ryan Kelly
Defendant:
Electronic Arts, Inc., Andrew Wilson, Blake Jorgensen and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Bowers et al v. Kelly et al
as 1:2013cv06265
Plaintiff:
Daquan Bowers
Defendant:
Raymond Kelly, Neil Fenton, Andrew Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Phil Wilson
as 13-30657
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
PHIL ANDREW WILSON
Barajas v. Biggs et al
as 3:2013cv01469
Plaintiff:
Joseph Edward Barajas
Defendant:
Robert Biggs, Chudy, Andrew Wilson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
United States of America v. Knowles (Melvin)
as 13-873
Appellee USA:
United States of America
Defendant:
Steven Knowles, AKA Manny Fresh, Michael Andrews, Glen Basket, AKA Big Mugs and others
Defendant - Appellant:
Donte Melvin, AKA Pudgy
Wilson v. Ryan et al
as 2:2013cv00383
Respondent:
Charles L Ryan and Attorney General of the State of Arizona
Plaintiff:
Robert Andrew Wilson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Wilson v. Wilson et al
as 1:2013cv00237
Plaintiff:
Timothy Andrew Wilson
Defendant:
Jessica Lee Wilson, John Doe #1 and John Doe #2
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Timothy Wilson v. Brent T. Calhoun
as 13-6057
Plaintiff - Appellant:
TIMOTHY ANDREW WILSON
Defendant - Appellee:
BRENT T. CALHOUN, Sergeant/Police Officer, Individually and in his official capacities
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
