Cases 81 - 90 of 96
USA v. David Hill
as 12-35817
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
DAVID BRIAN HILL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2012cv07240
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Hill v. United States of America
as 2:2012cv00394
Petitioner:
David Brian Hill
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255
HILL et al v. CITY OF PHILADELPHIA et al
as 2:2012cv02360
Plaintiff:
BRIAN HILL and TWANIA HILL
Defendant:
CITY OF PHILADELPHIA, JEFFREY CUJDIK and JOHN MOUZON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NFS Leasing Inc. v. Hill et al
as 1:2011cv11476
Plaintiff:
NFS Leasing Inc.
Defendant:
Brian Hill, DelMar Corporate Communications LLC, Larry Downs and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Hernandez, et al v. Echosphere, LLC, et al
as 0:2011cv61824
Defendant:
Echosphere, LLC , Dish Network LLC , Dish Network Service, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Richard D. Hernandez , Joseph Ellis , Antonio Abrams and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 0201
Hill v. Social Security Administration, Commissioner
as 2:2011cv01167
Plaintiff:
Thomas Brian Hill
Defendant:
Social Security Administration, Commissioner
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405
Hill et al v. Lake Austin Properties I, Ltd.
as 6:2010cv01636
Plaintiff:
Brian Hill and Terry Hill
Defendant:
Lake Austin Properties I, Ltd.
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1701
Patton v. Haddox et al
as 2:2010cv00743
Plaintiff:
Rusty Patton
Defendant:
Michael Haddox, Robert J Stevenson, Miller Joe and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Perkumpulan Investor Crisis Center Dressel - WBG v. Wong et al
as 2:2009cv01786
Plaintiff:
Perkumpulan Investor Crisis Center Dressel - WBG and Perkumpulan Investor Crisis Center Dressel - WBG
Defendant:
Danny MK Wong, Frank Ho, Joseph Yau and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
