Cases 81 - 90 of 253
Brown v. United States of America et al
as 2:2018cv02851
Defendant:
Mary Booker, Edna Prince, Sheena Bailey and others
Plaintiff:
Carl Brown
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Lee v. Bailey et al
as 3:2018cv01324
Defendant:
(f/n/u) Smith, James Bailey and (f/n/u) Presson
Plaintiff:
Anderson Lee
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Bailey v. Roco-Woods LLC d/b/a The Woods at Ridgeway
as 2:2018cv02801
Defendant:
Roco-Woods, LLC
Undetermined:
Temiika Gipson
Plaintiff:
Lidarius Bailey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Bailey v. Merlyn Funding, LLC (JRG2)
as 3:2018cv00481
Plaintiff:
Joshua R. Bailey
Defendant:
Merlyn Funding, LLC
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692
Bailey et al v. Utopix Medical, LLC et al
as 2:2018cv02719
Defendant:
Utopix Medical, LLC, David Finch, Jr., Jon Y. Yamamoto and others
Plaintiff:
R. Sadler Bailey and Mark Miller
Undetermined:
Donna Russell
Cause Of Action: 35 U.S.C. § 271
United States of America v. Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System et al
as 1:2018cv01181
Defendant:
Calvin Bailey
Garnishee:
Tennessee Consolidated Retirement System
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Tollison et al v. Shoupe et al
as 2:2018cv00062
Plaintiff:
Glenda Stewart, Candida Bailey, Amanda Jones-Oakes and others
Defendant:
Donna Daniels, Oddie Shoupe, Andrea Fox and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Crawford v. Brooks et al
as 2:2018cv02493
Defendant:
Officer Brooks, RN Bailey, W. Dietz and others
Plaintiff:
Emmanuel Crawford
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2018cv00638
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e
Bailey v. Matthew Queen and Schuster Co.
as 3:2018cv00596
Plaintiff:
Latonya Bailey
Defendant:
Matthew Queen and Schuster Co., Matthew Queen, Schuster Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
