Cases 81 - 90 of 94
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ferreyra et al
as 2:2009cv01227
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Ferreyra, Roberto C. Ramirez and Jazz Wave Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 553 Unauthorized Reception of Cable Service
J & J Sports Productions, Inc. v. Ferreyra et al
as 2:2009at00702
Plaintiff:
J & J Sports Productions, Inc.
Defendant:
Francisco Javier Ferreyra, Roberto C. Ramirez and Jazz Wave Entertainment, Inc.
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
USA v. Israel Ramirez
as 09-1815
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
ISRAEL C. RAMIREZ
Roderick Washington v. Arnold Schwarzenegger et al
as 2:2009cv01795
Plaintiff:
Roderick Washington
Defendant:
Arnold Schwarzenegger, Arnold Schwarzenegger, James Tilton and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ramirez v. Litton Loan Servicing LP et al
as 2:2009cv00319
Plaintiff:
Ella C Ramirez
Defendant:
Litton Loan Servicing LP and Penny Mac Loan Services
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Ramirez-Galvan v. USA
as 2:2009cv00017
Respondent:
USA
Petitioner:
Juan C Ramirez-Galvan
Cause Of Action: U.S. Government Defendant
Ramirez et al v. Lincoln Electric Company et al
as 1:2008wf17283
Plaintiff:
Julian C. Ramirez and Nelda Ramirez
Defendant:
Lincoln Electric Company, Hobart Brothers Company, ESAB Group, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: Diversity
Johnson v. Carrol, et al.,
as 2:2008cv01494
Plaintiff:
OShay L Johnson
Defendant:
Carrol, J Johnson, J. Fowler and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2008cv00981
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Juan Ramirez-Villalpando v. Eric H. Holder Jr.
as 08-72102
Petitioner:
JUAN C. RAMIREZ-VILLALPANDO, AKA Juan Carlos Ramirez
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, Jr., Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
