Cases 81 - 90 of 916
Mickel Watson v. Charlotte CI Warden, et al
as 23-10557
Plaintiff / Appellant:
MICKEL WATSON
Defendant / Appellee:
CHARLOTTE CI WARDEN, WARDEN ASST. WARDEN, REPRESENTATIVE OF THE SECRETARY and SECRETARY, FLORIDA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Umanzor v. FreedomRoads, LLC, et al
as 3:2023cv00117
Defendant:
Camping World RV Sales, LLC, RV World, LLC, FreedomRoads, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Wilson Umanzor
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00084
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petiti
Vinodh Raghubir v. Taylor CI Warden
as 23-10100
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
TAYLOR CI WARDEN
McKinley v. Mur-Ci Homes, Inc.
as 3:2023cv00027
Plaintiff:
Camie McKinley
Defendant:
Mur-Ci Homes, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 201 Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2023cv00003
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Mandamus
ARBELO-DEVALLE v. WARDEN TAYLOR CI et al
as 4:2023cv00002
Plaintiff:
ANGEL ARBELO-DEVALLE
Defendant:
WARDEN TAYLOR CI and RICKY DIXON
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zografidis v. Richards
as 22-3197
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Konstantinos Zografidis
Defendant / Appellee:
Vanessa Richards, Assistant United States Attorney, Westport Police Department and Statewide Grievance Committee
Defendant:
Michael Edward Runowicz, Assistant United States Attorney, Sarah P Karwan, Assistant United States Attorney, Deirde M. Daly, United States Attorney and others
Vinodh Raghubir v. Taylor CI Warden
as 22-14190
Petitioner / Appellant:
VINODH RAGHUBIR
Respondent / Appellee:
TAYLOR CI WARDEN
James Logan v. J. Godwin, et al
as 22-14171
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JAMES ALEXANDER LOGAN
Defendant / Appellee:
J. A. GODWIN, T. DYKES, P. WHITE and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
