Cases 81 - 90 of 265
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00835
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2013cv05503
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
as 1:2013cv02379
Plaintiff:
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Defendant:
Mayor and City Council of Baltimore
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2201 Constitutionality of State Statute(s)
Prixie Montgomery v. Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc.
as 4:2013mc01734
Plaintiff:
Prixie Montgomery
Defendant:
Clear Channel Broadcasting Inc.
Emrit v. Universal Music Group, Inc., et al
as 13-1904
Plaintiff - Appellant:
RONALD SATISH EMRIT
Defendant - Appellee:
ATLANTIC RECORDING CORPORATION, UNIVERSAL MUSIC GROUP, INC., RECORDING INDUSTRY ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA and others
Bartlett v. Clear Channel Outdoor Inc
as 3:2013cv03359
Plaintiff:
Alan Bartlett
Defendant:
Clear Channel Outdoor Inc
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Other Contract
Skopis v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
as 1:2013cv05108
Plaintiff:
Alex Skopis
Defendant:
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Torts to Land
National Photo Group, LLC v. Clear Channel Communications, Inc. et al
as 5:2013cv00531
Defendant:
Clear Channel Communications, Inc., KHFI FM 96.7, KPEK FM 100.3 and others
Plaintiff:
National Photo Group, LLC
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 501 Copyright Infringement
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2013cv00684
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1981 Civil Rights
Ojala Properties, LLC v. Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
as 1:2013cv01226
Plaintiff:
Ojala Properties, LLC
Defendant:
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity: Forcible Detainer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
