Cases 81 - 90 of 549
WEBSTER v. CARTER JR et al
as 1:2022cv02416
Plaintiff:
TOBY L. WEBSTER
Defendant:
ROBERT E CARTER JR, DAUSS, INDIANA DEPT CORRECTIONS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Rivas v. Conyers et al
as 2:2022cv00789
Defendant:
A. Nelson, Jessica L. Conyers, Gerry Perez and others
Plaintiff:
Yoandry Primelle Rivas
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
CONYERS v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2022cv04837
Plaintiff:
EARL CONYERS
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 26 U.S.C. § 7422 IRS: Refund Taxes
MYNATT v. REAGLE et al
as 2:2022cv00514
Plaintiff:
JARED MYNATT
Defendant:
DENNIS REAGLE, MAGGIE BRYANT, RUIZ and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Danley v. Conyers et al
as 5:2022cv04027
Plaintiff:
Stacy L. Danley, II
Defendant:
Alexander Conyers and South Carolina State University
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
PHILLIPS et al v. EDMONDS et al
as 1:2022cv02184
Plaintiff:
JAMES E. PHILLIPS
Defendant:
REAGAL, EDMONDS, A. SHAW and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. CARTER JR. et al
as 1:2022cv01674
Plaintiff:
AARON J. SMITH
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER JR., JAMES BASINGER, W. WILSON and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
GRIFFIN v. CARTER et al
as 1:2022cv01666
Plaintiff:
VIRGIL GRIFFIN
Defendant:
ROBERT CARTER, DENNIS REAGLE, CHARLES HOUCHINS and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
DANIELS v. SOLOMON et al
as 1:2022cv01541
Plaintiff:
RA'MAR DANIELS
Defendant:
T. SOLOMON, J. D. BALLENGER, C. WARGNY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Conyers v. United States of America
as 1:2022cv06465
Plaintiff:
Rashaad Conyers
Defendant:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate / Correct Illegal Sentenc
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
