Cases 81 - 90 of 167
David Hamilton v. Joe Lizarraga
as 17-72498
Petitioner:
DAVID HAMILTON
Respondent:
JOE A. LIZARRAGA, Warden, Warden
Batiste-Swilley v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00443
Defendant:
Dustin Brown, Robert Holmes, Raymond Klug and others
Plaintiff:
Lisa Batiste-Swilley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Smith et al v. City of Baton Rouge et al
as 3:2017cv00436
Defendant:
AIX Group, Jonathan Abadie, Jason Acree and others
Plaintiff:
Sean Benjamin, Lubin Gilbert, Sophie Kosofsky and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hamilton v. Corujo
as 2:2017cv00817
Plaintiff:
David Hamilton
Defendant:
K Corujo
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
In re: Kenneth Lewi
as 17-1694
Plaintiff - Petitioner:
In re: KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Defendant - Respondent:
ATTORNEY GENERAL UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, WARDEN FORT DIX FCI, JUDGE JAMES E. SHADID and others
Not Party - Nominal Respondent:
ROBERT B. KUGLAR
HAMILTON v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2017cv01532
Plaintiff:
DAVID HAMILTON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD, DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Miles et al v. Brister et al
as 0:2017cv00263
Plaintiff:
Gordon Miles and David Hamilton
Defendant:
Jana Skye Brister Korby, Staci Bovin, Katherine McDowell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
LEWIS v. LEWIS et al
as 1:2017cv00330
Petitioner:
KENNETH WAYNE LEWIS
Respondent:
JAMES LEWIS, DARILYNN KNAUSS, BRADLEY MURPHY and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Michael Barber, et al v. Cordis Corporation
as 16-80140
Plaintiff - Respondent:
MICHAEL BARBER, ANDREW CLOS, JACQUELYN HANSON and others
Defendant - Petitioner:
CORDIS CORPORATION
Barber et al v. Cordis Corporation et al
as 3:2016cv03086
Plaintiff:
Michael Barber , Andrew Clos , Jacquelyn Hanson and others
Defendant:
Cordis Corporation , Johnson & Johnson and Cardinal Health, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
