Cases 81 - 90 of 50,729
Gardner v. Capital Energy PA LLC et al
as 1:2024cv00078
Plaintiff:
Gary Gardner
Defendant:
AEP Texas Inc. and Capital Energy PA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Austin et al v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
as 2:2024cv02324
Plaintiff:
Gary Austin and Crystal Austin
Defendant:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2271 Federal Tort Claims Act
Wilke v. Broughton
as 2:2024cv00674
Petitioner:
Jonathan David Wilke
Respondent:
Gary Broughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Perkins v. Bamke et al
as 2:2024cv00673
Plaintiff:
Gregory Perkins
Defendant:
Aaron Bamke, Jane Doe and Gary Hoffman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
George Sachs v. Ricardo Inc., et al
as 24-1468
Plaintiff:
GEORGE SACHS, dba Paradyme Systems USA
Defendant:
RICARDO INC., WESLEY SCHARMEN, PHILIP MICHAEL and others
BELISLE et al v. AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
as 9:2024cv80683
Plaintiff:
MICHAEL BELISLE and LINDA GARY
Defendant:
AIG PROPERTY CASUALTY COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Fantel v. Handley et al
as 3:2024cv00545
Plaintiff:
C. John Fantel
Defendant:
Jeremy Handley, Stacey O'Neil, Joseph H. Nguyen and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Ridgway v. United States of America
as 7:2024cv00446
Plaintiff:
Gary Ridgway
Defendant:
United States of America
Interested Party:
Torts Branch USDOJ
Wilson v. Boughton
as 2:2024cv00655
Petitioner:
Sanchez Wilson
Respondent:
Gary Boughton
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Alexander et al v. The 3M Company et al
as 1:2024cv04068
Defendant:
The 3M Company, Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Co., AGC Chemicals Americas Inc. and others
Plaintiff:
Bryan Alexander, Stuart Allen, Keith Aytay and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442 Notice of Removal - Suit against Federal Officer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
