Cases 81 - 90 of 240
Wilkinson v. Sevcon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11618
Plaintiff:
Jack Wilkinson
Defendant:
Sevcon, Inc., Matthew Goldfarb, Matthew Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
Scarantino v. Sevcon, Inc. et al
as 1:2017cv11580
Plaintiff:
Louis Scarantino
Defendant:
Sevcon, Inc., Matthew Goldfarb, Matthew Boyle and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 78
The San Mateo County Investment Pool v. Fuld
as 1:2009cv01239
Defendant:
John F. Akers, Citigroup Global Markets Inc., Erin Callan and others
Plaintiff:
The San Mateo County Investment Pool and Madeline Dimodica
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 77
In Re: Ex Parte Application of W L Gore & Associates Incorporated and W L Gore & Associates Canada Incorporated
as 2:2015mc00050
In Re:
W L Gore & Associates Incorporated and W L Gore & Associates Canada Incorporated
Defendant:
Dr David Goldfarb
Cause Of Action: Civil Miscellaneous Case
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv03513
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Notice of Removal
Carter v. O'Toole et al
as 4:2017cv01356
Plaintiff:
Jerry Carter
Defendant:
Lawrence O'Toole, Scott Marlow, Jeffrey Goldfarb and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv20239
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446
United States of America v. Goffer
as 16-3698
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant:
Craig Drimal, Arthur Cutillo, David Plate and others
Defendant / Appellant:
Zvi Goffer
United States of America v. Goffer(Kimelman)
as 11-4409
Appellee:
United States of America
Defendant / Appellant:
Michael Kimelman
Defendant:
Craig Drimal, Arthur Cutillo, David Plate and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2017cv00141
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
