Cases 81 - 90 of 91
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2010cv00216
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights (Employment Discrimination)
Elvis Galindo et al v. City of Los Angeles et al
as 2:2010cv01448
Defendant:
City of Los Angeles, Does, S. Flores and others
Plaintiff:
Edward Galindo, Elvis Galindo, Gloria Galindo and others
Martinez v. Edmondson, et al
as 09-2258
Plaintiff - Appellant:
EDDIE G. MARTINEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
DAVID EDMONDSON, Commander, DANIEL GONZALES, Agent, CARROLL CAUDILL, Agent and others
Vasquez v. Chase Home Finance, LLC.
as 5:2009cv00748
Plaintiff:
Eric J. Vasquez
Defendant:
Chase Home Finance, LLC. and Chase Home Finance, LLC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Petition for Removal
Harris v. Justice et al
as 2:2009cv01047
Plaintiff:
Howard Mack Harris
Defendant:
U S Dept of Justice, Federal Bureau of Prisons, Joe P Young and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Bivens Act
Lynnard Smith v. Steven Davis, et al
as 09-15545
Plaintiff - Appellant:
LYNNARD A. SMITH
Defendant - Appellee:
STEVEN G. DAVIS, D. M. BENEDETTI, J. VERA and others
Candy Vasquez v. Michael Astrue
as 08-56608
Plaintiff - Appellant:
CANDY J. VASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Martinez v. Edmondson et al
as 1:2008cv00830
Plaintiff:
Eddie G. Martinez
Defendant:
David Edmondson, David Edmondson, Daniel Gonzales and others
Cause Of Action: Federal Question
Frederick Vasquez v. Michael Astrue
as 08-15748
Plaintiff - Appellant:
FREDERICK J. VASQUEZ
Defendant - Appellee:
MICHAEL J. ASTRUE, Commissioner of Social Security
Candy J Vasquez v. Michael J Astrue
as 5:2007cv01035
Plaintiff:
Candy J Vasquez
Defendant:
Michael J Astrue and Michael J Astrue
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
