Cases 81 - 90 of 157
WILLIAMS v. BANGOR DAILY NEWS et al
as 1:2017cv00120
Plaintiff:
BRADLEY PAUL WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BANGOR DAILY NEWS , BANGOR PUBLISHING COMPANY , ABIGAIL CURTIS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Bell v. The USPS City of Texas Lovelady Inc. et al
as 9:2017cv00044
Plaintiff:
Joseph Bell
Defendant:
The USPS City of Texas Lovelady Inc., Tammy J Warren and Bruce A Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Morris Warren v. Eric Wilson
as 17-5025
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Morris J. Warren
Defendant - Appellee:
Eric Wilson, Warden
Fleck v. Livingston et al
as 2:2017cv00026
Plaintiff:
Marcus Stephen Fleck
Defendant:
Brad Livingston, Rosie Norman, Denicia Jefferson and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
WARREN v. WILSON
as 1:2017cv00047
Plaintiff:
MORRIS J. WARREN
Defendant:
ERIC WILSON
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Warren et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 2:2016cv15832
Plaintiff:
Jerry A. Warren and Jolinda J. Warren
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Warren et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as OKW/5:16-cv-01169
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Warren and Jolinda J Warren
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Warren et al v. Janssen Research & Development LLC et al
as 5:2016cv01169
Plaintiff:
Jerry A Warren and Jolinda J Warren
Defendant:
Janssen Research & Development LLC , Janssen Ortho LLC , Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Morris Warren v. Louis Winn, Jr.
as 16-6709
Petitioner - Appellant:
MORRIS J. WARREN
Respondent - Appellee:
LOUIS W. WINN, JR., Warden
UGI Sunbury LLC v A Permanent Easement
as 3:2016cv00798
Plaintiff:
UGI Sunbury LLC
Defendant:
A Permanent Easement, Timothy P. East , National City Mortgage and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 717
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
