Cases 81 - 90 of 1,116
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv43559
Plaintiff:
ADAM J DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
DAVIS v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv41780
Plaintiff:
BENJAMIN J DAVIS
Defendant:
3M COMPANY, 3M OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY LLC, AEARO HOLDING LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Thaler v. Thaler et al
as 2:2021cv01419
Plaintiff:
John H Thaler
Defendant:
Brittany Rae Thaler, Dawna Rae Chavez, Lawrence Cairo and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
DAVIS v. ELLIS et al
as 3:2021cv15362
Plaintiff:
EVERETT J. DAVIS
Defendant:
WARDEN CHARLES ELLIS, BRIAN M. HUGHES and C.F.G. HEALTH SERVICES LLC
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
USA v. Lashawn Davis
as 21-3729
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
LASHAWN DAVIS, aka Lashawn J. Davis
Bayon v. Davis et al
as 5:2021cv00399
Plaintiff:
Carlos Bayon
Defendant:
Brian J. Davis, Department of Justice and United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Hopkins v. Superconductor Technologies Inc. et al
as 1:2021cv01041
Plaintiff:
Matthew Hopkins
Defendant:
Superconductor Technologies Inc., Jeff Quiram, Lynn J. Davis and others
Bostick et al v. Modlin, Sr. et al
as 8:2021cv01496
Defendant:
Calvert RM, LLC t/a Re/Max One, Carole L. Modlin, Mark J. Davis and others
Plaintiff:
Lauren D. Mullins and William A. Bostick
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
(PC) Howell v. Johnson et al
as 2:2021cv00997
Defendant:
J. Davis, K. Johnson, A. Gough and others
Plaintiff:
Kareem J. Howell
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hayriye Gok v. Roman Catholic Church, et al
as 21-1897
Defendant / Appellee:
TRINITY HEALTH CATHOLIC HEALTH EAST, ARCHDIOCESE OF PHILADELPHIA, STANLEY CHAN and others
Defendant:
PAM FIERRO and ROMAN CATHOLIC CHURCH
Plaintiff / Appellant:
HAYRIYE BERIL GOK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
