Cases 81 - 90 of 142
John Krueger v. Matthew Cate
as 13-16094
Petitioner - Appellant:
JOHN WALTER KRUEGER
Respondent - Appellee:
MATTHEW L. CATE
John Krueger v. Matthew Cate
as 13-16094
Petitioner:
JOHN WALTER KRUEGER
Respondent:
MATTHEW L. CATE
Walter v. The State of New York
as 13-1774
Plaintiff - Appellant:
Margarita T. Walter
Defendant - Appellee:
The State of New York, The Office of Court Administration of The Unified Court System of The State of New York, Hon. Judge Jonathan Lippman, Individually and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv00415
Debtor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 0157 Motion for Withdrawal of Reference
John Kulesa, Jr. v. Sharon Rex
as 13-1118
Plaintiff - Appellant:
JOHN WALTER KULESA, JR.
Defendant - Appellee:
SHARON L. REX, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFFS DEPARTMENT, PATRICIA E. COONAHAN and others
Dabbelt v. Homecoming Financial, LLC et al
as 6:2012cv01013
Plaintiff:
John Walter Dabbelt
Defendant:
Homecoming Financial, LLC , Residential Funding Company, LLC , Residential Accredit Loans, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1601
Arae et al v. McKesson Corporation et al
as 2:2012cv05053
Plaintiff:
Willie Adams, Alex Anderson, Sherwin Arae and others
Defendant:
AstraZeneca PLC, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals LP, Does and others
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2012cv01153
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12101
KULESA v. REX et al
as 2:2012cv02248
Plaintiff:
JOHN WALTER KULESA, JR.
Defendant:
SHARON L. REX, MONTGOMERY COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, PATRICIA E. COONAHAN and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Oxendine-Bey v. Raper et al
as 5:2012ct03051
Plaintiff:
Christopher M. Oxendine-Bey
Defendant:
John Raper, John Walters, John Knotts and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
