Cases 81 - 90 of 139
Zivec v. Rose et al
as 3:2011cv00623
Plaintiff:
L. Peter Zivec
Defendant:
Steven T. Rose, MaryBeth Dumont, Delaware County District Attorney and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Peters et al v. DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. et al
as 1:2011dp20728
Plaintiff:
Michael L. Peters and Stephanie L. Peters
Defendant:
DePuy Orthopaedics, Inc. , DePuy, Inc. , Johnson & Johnson and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Olcese, et al v. Rohal, et al
as 5:2011cv00884
Plaintiff:
L. Peter Olcese and Benicia Barria Gonzalez
Defendant:
John D. Rohal, Estate of Patricia D. Rohal, Sergio Alvarez and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 1:2011cv06112
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Plaintiff:
Sandra L. Peters
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1383 Review of HHS Decision
Barbara L. Peters v. Wachovia Bank NA et al
as 5:2011cv00255
Defendant:
Does, Regional Service Corp and Wachovia Bank NA
Plaintiff:
Barbara L Peters
United States of America v. Peters et al
as 2:2011cv02034
Plaintiff:
United States of America
Defendant:
Kevin W Peters, Stacey L Peters, Wayne E Peters and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2011cv00473
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1345 Default of Student Loan
Carling v. Peter
as 10-5206
Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant - Appellee:
Francis Carling
Defendant-Counter-Claimant - Appellant:
Kristan L. Peters
PETER v. SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP et al
as 2:2010cv83491
Plaintiff:
AMORELLA L. PETER
Defendant:
SOUTHERN TEXTILE CORP and H.K. PORTER CO., INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Peters v. Aurora Loan Services LLC et al
as 2:2010cv02119
Plaintiff:
Kathryn L Peters
Defendant:
Aurora Loan Services LLC , Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems Incorporated and Unknown Parties
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
