Cases 81 - 90 of 632
Lunsford v. Speedup 3 LLC et al
as 5:2022cv00122
Plaintiff:
Samantha Lunsford
Defendant:
Speedup 3 LLC and Lakhbir Singh
Grant Smith v. Brian Mariotti et al
as 2:2022cv03155
Plaintiff:
Grant Smith
Defendant:
Brian Mariotti, Russell Nickel, Andrew Perlmutter and others
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1109 Breach of Fiduciary Duties
LOVE v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00811
Plaintiff:
TONY LIONEL LOVE
Defendant:
MARK SEVIER, JOSEPH, SANFORD and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
CRAIN v. SEVIER et al
as 1:2022cv00788
Plaintiff:
DURELL T. CRAIN
Defendant:
SEVIER, FRENCH, PAIGE and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
LUNSFORD v. MSCKI, LLC d/b/a KILLER INSTINCT
as 1:2022cv00769
Plaintiff:
JAMES LUNSFORD
Defendant:
MSCKI, LLC (dba) KILLER INSTINCT and MSCKI, LLC d/b/a KILLER INSTINCT
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Sean Smarra v. Boilermaker Blacksmith National Pension Trust, et al
as 22-1415
Plaintiff / Appellee:
SEAN SMARRA
Defendant / Appellant:
BOILERMAKER BLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION TRUST and BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF BOILERMAKER BLACKSMITH NATIONAL PENSION TRUST
Defendant:
MICHAEL G. MORASH, RONNIE L. TRAXLER, DAVID J. ZACH and others
US v. Roger Lunsford
as 22-6079
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
ROGER KEITH LUNSFORD
GADDIS v. LAUGHLIN et al
as 1:2022cv00041
Plaintiff:
DEREK RYAN GADDIS
Defendant:
JOEY LAUGHLIN, LEONARD BAKER, ZACK JONES and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
ROSE v. ZATECKY et al
as 2:2022cv00005
Plaintiff:
ANTONIO ROSE
Defendant:
DUSHAN ZATECKY, ALSIP, STAMPER and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jackson v. US
as 22-1276
Plaintiff / Appellee:
GLORIA J. JACKSON, DAVID ALCANTARA, SHEYLAH ALCIDE and others
Defendant / Appellant:
UNITED STATES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
