Cases 81 - 90 of 104
Damaso-Mendoza v. Holder, Jr.
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 10-9579
Petitioner:
MANUEL DAMASO-MENDOZA, AKA Manuel Mendoza-Damaso, AKA Manuel D. Mendoza
Respondent:
ERIC H. HOLDER, JR.
USA v. Jose Mendoza-Ramirez
as 10-50215
Plaintiff - Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant - Appellant:
JOSE MANUEL MENDOZA-RAMIREZ, AKA Jose Manuel Mendoza
Allison et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
![Final or Interim Order We have downloadable decisions or orders for this case](/bundles/docketsbrowsing/images/gavel.png)
as 0:2010cv00267
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Allison, Joseph Theodore Ball, June A. Beckelman and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co. Inc.
Allison et al v. Medtronic, Inc. et al
as 4:2009cv03023
Plaintiff:
Kenneth E. Allison, Joseph Theodore Ball, June A. Beckelman and others
Defendant:
Medtronic, Inc., Medtronic International Technology, Inc. and Medtronic Puerto Rico Operations Co.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendoza v. Clinton et al
as 4:2009cv02818
Petitioner:
Jose Manuel Mendoza
Respondent:
Hillary Rodham Clinton, Patrick F. Kennedy, Florence Fultz and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Mendoza v. Quarterman
as 1:2009cv00547
Petitioner:
Manuel Mendoza
Respondent:
Nathaniel Quarterman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Davis et al v. DS Corp. et al
as 2:2009cv04032
Plaintiff:
Sybil Yvette Davis, Sybil Yvette Davis, Sybil Davis and others
Defendant:
DS Corp. and CH2M Hill Constructors, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Mendoza v. Lewis et al
as 5:2009ct03105
Plaintiff:
Manuel Mendoza
Defendant:
Robert Lewis, Mr. Hains, Mrs. Byrd and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.