Cases 81 - 90 of 4,698
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv03268
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Mann v. B&G Pipeline Company
as 1:2024cv00163
Defendant:
B&G Pipeline Company
Plaintiff:
Ronald L. Mann, Jr.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Daniel Mann v. Quiktrip Corporation
as 24-2100
Defendant:
Quiktrip Corporation, doing business as Quiktrip #644
Plaintiff:
Daniel G. Mann
Mann Utilities, Inc. v. WLM Contracting, Inc. et al
as 5:2024cv00267
Counter-Defendant:
MANN UTILITIES, INC.
Plaintiff:
MANN UTILITIES, INC.
Defendant:
WLM CONTRACTING, INC. and GREAT MIDWEST INSURANCE COMPANY
Counter-Claimant:
WLM CONTRACTING, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Notice of Removal
Geter et al v. Schak Transport, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv02264
Defendant:
Schak Transport, Inc., Horace Mann Insurance Company and John Doe 1-2
Plaintiff:
Camiella Payton and Gregory Geter
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 Notice of Removal - Motor Vehicle
Hill v. Mann et al
as 4:2024cv03090
Defendant:
Dr. Mann, Dr. Terique and Fennie Clay
Plaintiff:
Cymeyon V. Hill
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv01897
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Wingfield v. Clegg et al
as 1:2024cv02220
Defendant:
Kathy K. Guidry, State of Georgia, Dana Laney and others
Plaintiff:
Timothy Bernard Wingfield
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Field v. Summit Community Bank et al
as 3:2024cv00229
Counter-Defendant:
Mark Field Mark Field d/b/a Iron Horse Demolition
Plaintiff:
Mark Field Mark Field d/b/a Iron Horse Demolition agent of Iron Horse Demolition
Defendant:
Rodney Mann and Summit Community Bank
Counter-Claimant:
Rodney Mann
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Contract Dispute
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
