Cases 81 - 90 of 3,885
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00450
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 Job Discrimination (Race)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 0:2024cv60128
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Sullivan v. Aramark Food Services Corp et al
as 4:2024cv04019
Plaintiff:
Anthony Sullivan
Defendant:
Aramark Food Services Corp, . Coates, . Kuldfelt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Hafner v. DeSantis et al
as 8:2024cv00196
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Ashley Moody and Cord Byrd
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
HUMPHREY v. MOODY et al
as 7:2024cv00006
Plaintiff:
GREGORY HUMPHREY
Defendant:
JAMES MOODY, ASHLEY KERN and RODNEY FOULKS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00215
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2024cv06006
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
Moody et al v. Gartha et al
as 2:2024cv10120
Plaintiff:
Jerry Moody and Tracey Moody
Defendant:
Russell Charles Gartha, Harrison Ray Higgins, City of Southfield and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hafner v. DeSantis et al
as 1:2024cv20194
Plaintiff:
Eric Hafner
Defendant:
Ron DeSantis, Ashley Moody and Cord Byrd
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
D' Ambrosio v. Meta Platforms, Inc. et al
as 1:2024cv00200
Plaintiff:
Nikko D' Ambrosio, Facebook Entertainment LLC and Facebook, LLC
Defendant:
Meta Platforms, Inc., Abbigail Rajala, Rodney Rajala and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Libel,Assault,Slander
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
