Cases 81 - 90 of 3,389
Gordon et al v. 3M Company
as 2:2023cv01717
Defendant:
3M Company, Du Pont De Nemours Inc, UTC Fire & Security Americas Corporation Inc and others
Plaintiff:
Eliot Gordon, Keith Eugene Mokher, Christopher Mongillo and others
Petitioner:
Lawrence Pierson
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Navarro v. Community Care Partners LLC et al
as 3:2023cv02815
Plaintiff:
Christopher Navarro
Defendant:
Community Care Partners LLC, Steve Sorey and Randy Phelps
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Walker v. Phelps et al.
as 4:2023cv02385
Plaintiff:
Dorita Walker
Defendant:
Sandy Phelps, Kenneth Gee, Mr. James and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2023cv00191
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Interested Party:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1651 Petition for Writ of Coram Nobis
David Meyers v. Dean Locklear
as 23-7167
Plaintiff / Appellant:
DAVID MEYERS
Defendant / Appellee:
DEAN LOCKLEAR, WILLIAM BULLARD, LIEUTENANT BARNES and others
Stokes v. Payson et al
as 1:2023cv01324
Plaintiff:
Terrance J.M. Stokes
Defendant:
Lt. Payson, Warden Robert May, Sgt. O'pray and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Phelps Mineral Holdings, LLC v. Continental Resources, Inc.
as 1:2023cv00219
Plaintiff:
Phelps Mineral Holdings, LLC
Defendant:
Continental Resources, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2023cv09961
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 ed Diversity-Employment Discrimination
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 7:2023cv09827
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
