Cases 81 - 90 of 284
BAILEY v. SMITH et al
as 1:2016cv00267
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
RON SMITH and NORTH CAROLINA DEPARTMENT OF MOTOR VEHICLES LICNESE AND THEFT DIVISION
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA et al
as 1:2016cv00271
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM TOMIN, JR., K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. TOMIN et al
as 1:2016cv00273
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
WILLIAM C. TOMIN, JR., R.M. ASHLEY, K.D. MORLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00245
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, C.C. BLAKE, R.M ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BAILEY v. GARDNER et al
as 1:2016cv00261
Plaintiff:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant:
JOSEPH GARDNER, K.D. MORLEY, R.M. ASHLEY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 16-6377
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Thomas v. Duvall et al
as 3:2016cv00451
Plaintiff:
Angel Luis Thomas
Defendant:
Angela R. Duvall , W.M. Ritchie , Ron Smith and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Gaddis v. Kilgore et al
as 1:2016cv00075
Petitioner:
Thomas Gaddis
Respondent:
Jimmy Kilgore and Ron Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7255
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Robert Bailey v. City of Fayetteville, NC
as 14-7253
Plaintiff - Appellant:
ROBERT GENE BAILEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF FAYETTEVILLE, NORTH CAROLINA, WILLIAM C. TOMAN, JR., R. M. ASHLEY and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
