Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Rick McCartney v. Chase Curl, et al
as 25-1578
Plaintiff:
Rick L. McCartney
Defendant:
Chase Curl, Deputy, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Zack Sebree, Corporal, Henry County Sheriff's Office, Aaron Richardson, Corporal, Henry County Sheriff's Office and others
(PS) Swartz v. State of California
as 2:2025cv00902
Plaintiff:
Jesse F. Swartz
Defendant:
State of California, Gavin Newsom and Democratic Party
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Delshaun Nix v. Michael Swartz, et al
as 25-3183
Plaintiff:
DELSHAUN R. NIX
Defendant:
KIM HENDERSON, Warden, MELISSA S. PATTERSON, Captain, MCKENZIE D. HARTFORD, Lieutenant and others
Brown v. Swartz et al
as 1:2025cv00458
Plaintiff:
Shakour A. Brown
Defendant:
CO II Swartz, CO I Conklin, CO III Boal and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act
Swartz v. Alsup, et al.
as 25-1566
Plaintiff:
JESSE F. SWARTZ
Defendant:
WILLIAM ALSUP, DISTRICT JUDGE, JAMES THOMSON and MARISSA HARRIS
Swartz v. Araiz Ramirez
as 25-1564
Respondent:
V. ARAIZ RAMIREZ, Warden at Victorville FCI II Holding Facility
Petitioner:
JESSE FRANKLIN SWARTZ and Franklin Wright
Todd v. Derry Township et al
as 1:2025cv00435
Plaintiff:
Jason R. Todd
Defendant:
Derry Township, Selective Insurance Company, Natalie Nutt and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
DRUMMOND v. EVANS et al
as 2:2025cv00313
Plaintiff:
RASHEEM JAMES DRUMMOND
Defendant:
RANDY EVANS, SGT KOPLIC, BURC and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2025cv00238
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Swartz v. Ford Motor Co.
as 2:2025cv00612
Plaintiff:
Ruth S. Swartz
Defendant:
Ford Motor Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Breach of Contract
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
