Cases 81 - 90 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv04008
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00342
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Perez v. Torres, et al
as 26-3156
Plaintiff:
RAFAEL PEREZ
Defendant:
STEVEN TORRES, MONICA TORRES, SHANNON MARTEN and others
Stefannie Dyson v. Steven Klimek, et al
as 26-2492
Plaintiff:
STEFANNIE DYSON
Defendant:
STEVEN KLIMEK, JANE DOES, ROXANE BOUTTE and others
Mills v. Stevens Transport Inc et al
as 2:2026cv02222
Plaintiff:
Michael Mills
Defendant:
Stevens Transport Inc and Ayed Kamil Abu-Ajameh
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity - Notice of Removal
Rosenstein v. 3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company et al
as 2:2026cv02901
Plaintiff:
Steven Rosenstein
Defendant:
3M Company, f/k/a Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing Company, AGC Chemicals Americas Inc., Arkema, Inc. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Candler v. Ball, et al.
as 26-4579
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R.G. CANDLER
Defendant:
J. BALL, CHRISTOPHER BAKER, Correctional Officer at Wasco State Prison, JOSE ARMENDARIZ, Correctional Officer at Wasco State Prison and others
Candler v. Caro
as 26-4556
Plaintiff:
STEVEN R.G. CANDLER
Defendant:
ABRAM CARO, Bailiff at Tulare County Court
Camou v. Borla et al
as 5:2026cv07389
Plaintiff:
Michael Charles Camou
Defendant:
Edward Borla, Jefferey Macomber, N. Gonzalez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jones v. Pasco County Jail et al
as 8:2026cv02035
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Steven Jones
Defendant:
Pasco County Jail and Naphcare Medical
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
