Cases 81 - 90 of 217
Roper v. Wexford Health Services, Inc
as 8:2019cv00021
Plaintiff:
Darrell Wayne Roper
Defendant:
Wexford Health Services, Inc.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
Harris v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01450
Defendant:
Jane Doe, Wexford Health Services Inc, John Baldwin and others
Plaintiff:
Frederick S Harris
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Haughie v. Wexford Health Sources, Inc., et al
as 1:2018cv03963
Defendant:
michael smith, charles williams, newman azuike and others
Plaintiff:
Robert Haughie
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331
Keller v. Castillio et al
as 3:2018cv50402
Defendant:
Castillio, Vargas, Chismore and others
Plaintiff:
Hilton Lloyd Keller
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Johnson v. Pfister et al
as 1:2018cv07873
Defendant:
Michael Melvin, C/O Jackson, Major Blackerd and others
Plaintiff:
Michael Johnson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 1:2018cv00355
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
BROWN v. PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS et al
as 2:2018cv01476
Defendant:
ROBERTA PAVLICK, PENNSYLVANIA STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, DAWN LEGARS and others
Plaintiff:
JAMES BROWN
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
McCloud v. Lehman et al
as 2:2018cv00106
Defendant:
Dr. James Beane, Dr. Lehman and Wexford Health Services, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Adam Christopher McCloud
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv01347
Defendant:
Illinois Department of Corrections, Renz, Service List and others
Plaintiff:
Robin W Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Hickman v. Baldwin et al
as 1:2018cv06380
Defendant:
John R. Baldwin, Illinois Department Of Corrections, Renz and others
Plaintiff:
Robin W Hickman
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
