Cases 81 - 90 of 1,183,607
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv03363
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1255 Immigration: Failure USCIS To Adjudicate Permanent Residency Petition
Johnson v. Maningo Law et al
as 2:2024cv00827
Plaintiff:
Adrian Johnson
Defendant:
Maningo Law and Lauria Lynch-German
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Pearson v. Washington
as 2:2024cv11179
Petitioner:
Andre DeShawn Pearson
Respondent:
Michigan, People of the State of and Raphael Washington
Ragan #314744 v. Wellpath Medical Provider et al
as 1:2024cv00460
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Ragan #314744
Defendant:
Wellpath Medical Provider, Sarah Riley, Michael Travis and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Murzike v. Santa Rosa C.I.
as 3:2024cv00433
Plaintiff:
James T. Murzike
Defendant:
Santa Rosa C.I.
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Brown v. State of South Carolina, The et al
as 2:2024cv02810
Plaintiff:
Taquan L. Brown
Defendant:
State of South Carolina, The, Fourteenth Circuit Solicitor's Office, Isaac McDuffie Stone, III and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr (Other)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2024cv00732
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 702 Administrative Procedure Act
Johnson v. Stancil, et al
as 24-1180
Petitioner:
DERRICK JOHNSON
Respondent:
ANDRE STANCIL, Executive Director, Colorado Department of Corrections, JENNIFER HANSEN, Warden Colorado Territorial Correction Facility and THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF COLORADO
Todd Giffen v. Warden FMC Rochester
as 24-6406
Petitioner:
TODD MICHAEL GIFFEN
Respondent:
WARDEN FMC ROCHESTER
George Steen v. Todd Ishee
as 24-6409
Petitioner:
GEORGE MICHAEL STEEN
Respondent:
TODD E. ISHEE, Secretary of the Department of Adult Correction and BRETT BULLIS, Warden of Avery-Mitchell CI
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
